Dark Brown Dog by Stephen Crane Essay

_A Dark Brown Dog_ is a pitiful(p) story by the praised realistic write Stephen put out. Within this piece, unfold takes a diverse approach to the son and chase later on beginning by creating an atmosphere of disgracefulness. This indication is wellspring incorporated by Crane and stand be easily put up indoors the characters that Crane had carefully crafted. Specifically, the inglorious characteristic can be tack in varying levels within the draw and the youthfulness son. And while the prominence of this sadistic trait remains in the story, the trait helps hold a a change in son and fire wieners relationship. In the story, the spawns presence is go with by and is synonymous with sadism and abuse. The rootage chance in which the engender appears is when the boy first brings the unnoticeable brown quest for to his house. Naturally, the family clamors intimately the dog and scrutinize it to the point where the boy is protesting loudly as to delay the do g. At that moment the draw walks into the house in the midst of the yelling and, perceives that it would amaze and peevishness everybody if such a dog were allowed to remain, he decided that it should be so (Crane 3).This reflects how the father takes enjoys forcing the family to put up with the presence of the undesirable dog. The incident is too representative of how the father finds pleasure in others suffering, a principle of sadism. While this incident may non seem to define the father as an abuser, it remains as a apprehension of the full extent of the fathers sadistic nature. In item, the entire order of the fathers disgracefulness is encapsulated by the bout point of the story in which the boy and the dog come phratry from wizardness of their adventures only to arrive to the sight of the father throwing cooking utensils in a intoxicated rage.The sight drove the boy to look to shelter from under a send back while the dog trounced most the way excited by the s pectacle, unaware of the danger. The dogs vulnerability and naivety lead the father to take advantage of it as he beat the dog with a pan, force the dog into submission, and eventually, swung him two or three times hilariously rough his head, and then flung him with great accuracy by the window (Crane 6). The father was clearly teach by his ability to prey upon a defenseless dog and to murder him without a second thought. Not only that, unless this incident showed how father really precious to make the dog suffer as the father unnecessarily twirled the dog around before killing him.To a lesser extent, the boy similarly exhibits the abusive trait that is found inhis father and preferably of inflicting pain on every hotshot, the boy abuses the dog. For instance, when the boy and the dog first encounter one another, the dog acts playfully with the boy who apace hit the dog and sent him into a prayer like stance c everyplaceing the dogs submission. This submission was foud lu dicrous as it was stated that, the pip-squeak was greatly amused and gave him little taps repeatedly, to keep him so (Crane 1). Superficially, this depicts the child simply amusing himself. However, there exists an underlying layer that reveals the sadistic trait of the child as he finds delight in the dogs pain and fright. It shows how the child extracts a jot of superiority over the dog which Crane further establishes in his story by describing the child as a horrendous despot and the dog as a subject.In addition to this occurrence, the child had displayed his abusive nature on a specialise instance. Crane describes this instance as a general and recurring case as he describes how, Sometimes, too, the child would beat the dog, although it is not known that he ever had what truly could be called a just create (Crane 4). What is established here is that the child harms the dog for no reason. Through the conclusion derived previously, it is inferred that the child had done this deed because he found pleasure in exerting his might over the dog. This reestablishes how the child exhibits the sadistic traits which his father also bears, only to a lesser degree.Pointedly, Crane crafts the boy to be reflective of his fathers habits. This is done to show the rotary nature of abuse and how the ones being mistreat may develop sadistic traits themselves. Regardless, of this fact Crane proceeds to simultaneously adorn how abuse can shape a relationship. Specifically, the relationship being altered one existing between the boy and the dog. As noted, the boy and the dog first start out off with an abusive relationship with designer and dominance being held by the boy and a subservient role interpreted upon by the dog. This is perfectly encapsulated by the fact the dysfunctional family of the boy would often go out of their way to harm the dog and as a result, The child became a guardian and friend (Crane 3), to the dog.This is descriptive of how the abusive natu re of the boys station had forced him to take upon the role of a protector. Whats more, is that the abusive atmosphere of his home had led the boy to grow a fondness for his new companion and to filter to protect to dog instead of permit him befall to harm. What solidifies this conclusion is the ending of the story, after the father threw the dog out the window, the family had found the boy, seated by the body of his dark brown friend (Crane 6). When taken a step back, what this shows is how the abuse and sadism surrounding the boy and the dog had altered their relationship from an abusive one to one based upon allegiance and friendship.In conclusion, within the 6 short pages of a _Dark Brown Dog_, Stephen Crane creates characters with a shared and prominent trait of abusiveness. These characters were primarily the father, and to a lesser, but still meaningful extent, the boy. And while this trait had shaped the characters, it also played a role in defining the course of the boy and dogs relationship. Case in point, the abusive trait in the story had been constituent(a) to _Dark Brown Dog._